CRIT CARE MED 润色咨询

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

出版年份:1973 年文章数:5017 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Monthly 自引率:8.1% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2016-06-20 maomao0807

    审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。
    准备再找一个一杂志投稿。

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2015-02-28 ethan411

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2015-02-04 sumer

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2014-11-17 FibleChen

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2014-11-14 dsbgaia

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高
    一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高
    重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=523931, encodeId=8182523931e6, content=审稿的都是大牛,而且权利很大,editor最后的结论要看审稿人的打分。我一审一周被要求补实验,然后补实验半年后修回,然后二审40天又是大修,然后花了三个月再次修回,三审半个月“拒稿。三个审稿人,两个人的意见已经很少了,只有一个审稿人觉得研究内容不适合ccm的读者,仍然提议拒稿。最后,估计第三个大牛很厉害,主编听从这个大牛的意见给了拒稿。心里虽然非常不爽,但是审稿人的意见非常详细、尖锐,具体到全文有三个单词的拼写都给提出来了。经过补实验和修改,文章语言和质量得到了大大的提升。 <br> 准备再找一个一杂志投稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=471, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0b681617589, createdName=maomao0807, createdTime=Mon Jun 20 12:57:00 CST 2016, time=2016-06-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=510077, encodeId=b7825100e7e3, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:该杂志是为重病领域的一流的杂志,尤为值得的注意的他能够为基础研究提供交流平台。本人先后投稿两次,均为基础研究,一次是多脏器衰竭审稿6周被拒,理由比较充分,学习到了不少知识,另一次是当天拒稿,认为文章深度不够,只能改投。下次还是值得继续尝试的, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=685a92872, createdName=ethan411, createdTime=Sat Feb 28 09:26:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=509557, encodeId=d75b50955ea9, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这杂志审稿很认真,一共5个审稿人,其中似乎有统计学的专家。提了很多意见,尤其是统计学方面。被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6c061611816, createdName=sumer, createdTime=Wed Feb 04 17:08:00 CST 2015, time=2015-02-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507647, encodeId=aa6550e64787, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审了6周,尽管4位评审专家都比较看好,但还是被拒了,理由是收到的高质量文章太多。坑啊!一开始把我拒了来得更痛快!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=429, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=FibleChen, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:20:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507598, encodeId=4a9050e598df, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:审稿周期基本为四周或者五周,效率很高 <br> 一般有4个审稿人,对创新性以及严谨性的要求都非常高 <br> 重症医学里的top1,当然是不考虑ARJCCM的情况下 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=79991606004, createdName=dsbgaia, createdTime=Fri Nov 14 16:13:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487721, encodeId=18c548e72119, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=4afb42804, createdName=dryutao, createdTime=Tue Apr 03 19:16:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-04-03 dryutao

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享:危重病专业杂志,侧重临床。也会为较好的基础研究提供机会。审稿速度较快,2周左右。审稿人意见比较具体、详细。

    0

共27条页码: 2/3页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分